Seattle’s bigger embarrassment

Record Editorial

For many of us, Seattle is that big city a few hills and 30 interstate miles away. With the distance comes a comfort, knowing that all of the benefits of big city life such as the arts, pro sports, shopping

and entertainment are within easy reach. At the end of each day, however, we can sit in our homes, watch the news, shake our heads and be thankful we’re not in Seattle.

Several of us undoubtedly did just that during the WTO conference

and “Battle in Seattle.” However, what happened in Seattle did affect us all, and

as a result of the conference, we’re all sharing a collective black eye.

Like it or not, when most people think of Puget Sound or Washington

state, they think of Seattle. This is true of any identifiable region in the

country. When they consider New York, most people think of New York City.

When they contemplate California, the first thing that comes to mind is San

Francisco or Los Angeles.

It’s the same thing up here; while we may feel hometown

identification with Snoqualmie or North Bend or Preston or Carnation _ or Skykomish,

Lynden or Tenino, for that matter _ most will still think of Seattle as the city that

represents us all.

Therefore, it is doubly unfortunate that the post-conference words and

actions of Seattle Mayor Paul Schell have added to our regional black eye.

Late last week, the FBI’s pre-conference threat-summary was released.

It indicated the FBI had warned the city of the potential for violence as early

as mid-November. Schell and his advisors refused to listen, and – after the

troubles did break out – expressed surprise at the vandalism and other acts of

violence. Who were they trying to kid?

Subsequent revelations of Schell’s profane attacks on Seattle police

personnel in advance of the WTO meeting and last week’s very public

confrontation with King County Sheriff Dave Reichert have added to the mix.

During the latter, Schell told the sheriff he would “personally destroy” him, and

accused Reichert of staging the heavily publicized film of him running

down looters in Seattle.

Notably, Reichert was one of the few senior police officials to

question both the lack of preparation and the mayor and Chief Stamper’s

post-conference excuses.

If anyone’s guilty of staging something, it’s Mr. Schell. He was

obviously in over his head from the time planning for the WTO conference started.

He and his staff mishandled security preparations downtown, refused to listen

to experts and analysts who tried to warn him what was coming, and then

added insult to injury by telling people everything was under control when it

wasn’t. After everything blew up, Schell started offering excuses while looking

for someone to blame.

There’s an old saying about the progressive stages of a project. The last

two lines go something like, “Praise for the guilty and punishment for the

innocent.” Apparently that’s the style of “leadership” Mayor Schell believes in.

Unfortunately, his actions and comments are an embarrassment to all of

us in this region, and will probably continue to be so for some time. However,

all of us in the Valley can be thankful he’s not

our mayor. For all the occasional hiccups in local government, we are usually spared the pompous

pronouncements, excuses and vacant “leadership” that Seattle is sadly undergoing.

Mark Morgan, Editor