I am writing in response to a letter to the editor two weeks ago in which
a Snoqualmie resident criticizes Snoqualmie Planning
Commission members for their reluctant approval, (with conditions), of the Falls
Crossing project, and implies that personal gain was a factor in their decisions.
I agree with Laurie Baker that there is little benefit to the community as
a whole in this project. It is, in many ways, detrimental to
historic Snoqualmie, detrimental to Snoqualmie Falls as a tourist
attraction, desecrating to a sacred site for the Snoqualmie Tribe.It impacts
wildlife, increases traffic, and it is indeed a travesty to consider this project
on this culturally significant, unique and irreplaceable site. However, the
fact that it is simply a bad idea has, unfortunately, little relevance at this
point in the planning process.
The Falls Crossing property was zoned for commercial
development many years ago, long before Snoqualmie Ridge was even
considered, at a time when the idea of the city growing along SR202 to the
Falls seemed a reasonable plan. In retrospect, particularly in the context of
our current Snoqualmie Ridge growth boom, this was a poor planning
decision. The present Planning Commission has been in the unenviable
position of balancing the legal property rights of a landowner/ taxpayer
who finally wishes to develop the property in accordance with the applicable
zoning, with the needs of the present day community faced with an
unattractive, unpalatable project added to already more than sufficient growth.
I am pleased that we have had the present Planning Commission to
review this project. While I wish their final decision were otherwise, I
have the utmost respect for the individuals involved, and wish to thank them,
and their families, for the tremendous amount of time they have invested
in this project. Each individual has read the voluminous amount of
continually changing proposal drafts, impact statements, draft conditions,
correspondence, citizen comments and specialists’ reports, and has attended
multiple weekly meetings. The meetings have often been hostile and
intimidating. The synergy of their thoughtful
deliberation has, at least, resulted in conditions that significantly modify
the project and are legally defensible.
Thank you to Matt Stone for his concern for gateway and viewshed
issues, and steadfast concern for the businesses of downtown
Snoqualmie. Thank you to Carol Fix for her leadership in stimulating discussion,
willingness to ask questions, persistence in requesting satisfactory answers,
historical perspective, concern for wildlife and environmental issues,
and grace under personal attack. Duane Johnson quietly and tenaciously
followed traffic and environmental issues with his own research, when
necessary. Dale Sherman has contributed calm, invariably thoughtful
questions, well researched opinions, and the point of view of a business owner
in historic Snoqualmie. Terry Sorensen brought his broad historical
perspective on city affairs, familiarity with the Comprehensive Plan, and
trademark astute common-sense observations.
The Snoqualmie Planning Commission has worked hard, under
difficult conditions, to make as many modifications as possible to
this project. While I am disappointed with their decision, and will continue
to pursue alternatives to the building of this project, I have sincere respect
for their work. They deserve our thanks, not our criticism.
Mary Norton
Snoqualmie