Paying for `friendly’ support a mistake

Guest Columnist

I nearly fell out of my chair when I read that the Clinton


administration paid 28 witnesses $10,000 each to supply “friendly” testimony on


controversial federal ergonomics rules.


In a letter to Charles Jeffress of the federal Occupational Safety


and Health Administration (OSHA), Pat Cleary of the National Association


of Manufacturers expressed his frustration this way:


“I spent 10 years in federal government, four


of those at the Labor Department, and I must say this


is unprecedented. In the interest of fairness, I’m


enclosing an invoice for $10,000 for my testimony in


opposition to this rule.”


Cleary is still waiting for a reply from OSHA.


While Cleary’s $10,000 invoice was sent “tongue-in-cheek,”


what OSHA did is no laughing matter. In fact, it is a perfect example of why


the American people are so cynical about government.


Apparently, it is not uncommon to pay experts to testify on


proposed rules. But in this case, OSHA paid only those “experts” who


support the department’s proposed


ergonomics rule.


Why would bureaucrats resort to paying for supportive testimony if


the rule made sense and was based on sound science? The answer is,


they wouldn’t!


The inherent problem with any ergonomics regulation, including


the version proposed by the Washington State Department of Labor and


Industries, is there is simply no sound medical or scientific evidence to


support it. Whether it’s the state, federal or local ergonomics rule, it makes


no sense at this time. Employers will be forced to pay for a costly


unscientific experiment with no assurance that it will prevent a single injury.


Congress was so incensed by OSHA’s latest attempt to impose


ergonomics rules, not to mention the Clinton administration’s cavalier


disregard for the integrity of the federal rule-making process, that it


voted along party lines to cut off funds to OSHA for implementing its


ergonomics rules.


Hopefully, this is one battle Congress will win. Every


hard-working American knows that it is wrong to spend $280,000 of their tax money


to skew public testimony on proposed legislation.


Don Brunell is president of the Association of Washington


Business, Washington State’s Chamber of Commerce. Visit AWB on the Web


at www.awb.org.