It seems there are lots of unanswered questions … lots of

important issues that need to be dealt with … guests who need to be informed

of meetings so they can explain letters they have submitted as evidence

on this development from their various state agencies.

I wonder after seeing comments from an attorney about a state

employee not being qualified and unauthorized, will Carol Bordin or her

supervisor be asked to come out and explain this letter? Or are we to go

on the facts from this attorney for the developer? Both sides need to

address our planning commission so they fully understand all sides.

I only hope we continue to see articles about this Falls Crossing so

we can stay informed by our local paper.

Dan Perrins

Preston