Site Logo

Deal pending on Falls Crossing

Published 2:20 pm Thursday, October 2, 2008

SNOQUALMIE — Saving Snoqualmie Falls from

development is now one giant step closer to reality.

Efforts to conserve a major portion of property slated for

the proposed Falls Crossing project are moving forward on a fast

track, thanks to a $13.3 million deal hammered out over the past

two months.

The controversial Falls Crossing development

application came before the City Council for review following a

September 2000 recommendation for approval by the Snoqualmie

Planning Commission. Concerns over protection of the historic

view from the Falls, wildlife habitat and community character were

the subject of hot debate, leading to an exhaustive review process.

The recommendation included 694 findings and 136

conditions crafted to mitigate adverse environmental and community

impacts, but the project continued to draw fire from the

community and several environmental groups.

Documents provided by Snoqualmie city staff have

identified a series of actions that would set aside about 80 percent of

the property, owned by Puget Western Inc. (PWI), and would

convert the land into permanent open space. The plan requires that

development be confined to the PWI property located south

of Snoqualmie Parkway. The land north of the Parkway will be

limited to passive recreation activities, such as hiking.

Originally planned for 370 dwelling units and 215,000 square feet of

business and commercial space, the agreement limits Falls

Crossing to an equivalent business area, but less than 100 dwelling

units to be contained on 11 acres.

The proposal was presented to the City Council at its Feb.

12 regular meeting for a first look at the details. Following a

closed executive session, which is standard practice in real estate

purchase matters, Mayor Fuzzy Fletcher went on the record to

discuss the deal.

“This is the best thing that could have happened _ I’m

ecstatic,” Fletcher said. “The city listened to the community

and heard the message loud and clear. We’re saving the Falls and all

the land around it. The city worked a deal that is a win-win for

everyone.”

The complex, multi-jurisdictional agreement was brokered

by the Cascade Land Conservancy, a Seattle based non-profit

organization dedicated to preserving sensitive lands in King, Pierce

and Snohomish counties.

Officially titled the Snoqualmie Preservation

Initiative, the agreement includes the protection of 2,800 acres

along the Raging River and the potential to preserve another 4,000

acres of Raging River property currently owned by the Fruit

Growers Association. Also included are 600 acres of Tokul Creek

watershed lands, tributaries and trail protection. The Cascade

Land Conservancy, along with the city and the Snoqualmie Tribe,

would act as an advisory body on future land stewardship issues.

The proposed initiative calls for City Council approval of

the purchase-and-sale agreement by March 15. Although the land

conservancy will not be funding the sale, signing of the document

will initiate the joint planning area (JPA) process, a cooperative

land-use agreement between the city, King County and

the Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Co. (WRECO).

According to the documents, the city will pay $1.65

million toward the purchase price. WRECO obligations include a

$3 million down payment in June 2001, $2 million in 2005,

another $2 million in 2007 and two additional $2 million payments at

an as yet unscheduled date. If WRECO opts out of the deal,

the agreement allows King County to assume the corporation’s

payment schedule in order to continue the preservation plan.

“We appreciate that people have worked very hard on

this,” said PWI President Bob Boyd. “We’re trying to work within

parameters that work for others, and we’ve had to be accountable

to our stockholders as well.”

Boyd added that PWI will make a charitable contribution

to the Cascade Land Conservancy as an entity, but he did not

disclose the amount of the gift.

In exchange for WRECO’s payment, amended

interlocal agreements will increase the density cap and allow the

corporation to add another 268 dwelling units to Phase I of

Snoqualmie Ridge. The plan calls for expansion of the existing urban

growth area (UGA) for Phase II of the Ridge, but according to city

officials, the annexation was contemplated in the county’s 1994

comprehensive plan. The agreement states that the additional units

to be constructed in the Phase I area will not squeeze existing

development and the increased housing will replace planned

business park and retail space.

“We’re taking a small amount of growth now, but by doing

so we’re preventing major growth and sprawl in the future,”

Fletcher said. “We had to jump in the car, get up front and steer like hell

to do that.”

For its payment, the city of Snoqualmie will own all of

the PWI property north of Snoqualmie Parkway,

together with the Snoqualmie River and Kimball Creek open spaces.

The city will also gain a 6-acre parcel of land on the north side

of Snoqualmie Parkway as a site for a new city hall and fire station.

“A future municipal building site is already figured into

the city’s capital improvement plan,” explained City

Administrator Gary Armstrong. “We would have ended up paying more for a

site than the $1.65 million city share of this initiative purchase

price. We get the municipal property we need, and we preserve the Falls.

It can’t get any better than that.”

Presenters of the initiative pointed out that the

agreement will also has a provision for 25 to 30 additional Habitat for

Humanity of East King County homes and makes additional

funding available for a pedestrian/equestrian bridge. But more

importantly, City Attorney Pat Anderson said, successful

acquisition of all the properties will connect the land from Tiger

Mountain State Park to Rattlesnake Ridge as one, unbroken parcel of

publicly owned land.

“This agreement has been a lot of hard work,” Anderson

said. “We’re very pleased to bring this forward with the ability to

save the Falls. It’s an important agreement that gives all the

parties what they need and value the most, but the biggest winner

is the public.”