Falls Crossing moves to next phase
Published 1:19 am Friday, October 3, 2008
The Snoqualmie City Council is now in the process of making a decision on Falls Crossing, and with this step comes a whole new round of discussion and issues.
Although many of the local residents have concerns, both emotionally
and with regards to specific aspects of the project, it will be important that
the specifics stay the primary focus. And in the case of those who wish to
address the council at either of the two hearings planned for Oct. 24 and
25, keep comments focused on the findings and conditions developed by
the Planning Commission.
After having gone through the findings and conditions myself, there
are several ways to bring up issues with regards to the documentation.
Most concerns I have heard to this point can be directly related to a finding
or condition. Copies of the findings and conditions are available at the city
of Snoqualmie offices, so if you plan to speak, do your homework first.
The reason for limiting comments to the public record is that the
City Council has to make its decision based on the findings and conditions of
the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission provided
several opportunities for public input, much of which was heated and
emotional. Those comments then were used as input to the findings and conditions.
By sticking to the findings and conditions, it forces all of us to look at
the real issues and concerns, and it will curb emotional arguments based
on little fact.
So with that out of the way, there are several areas to look at.
First, Finding 130 with regards to the village retail area needs specific
guidelines on what the Falls Crossing project can contain as far as retail outlets. In
fact, maybe there shouldn’t be any retail in the Falls Crossing project, as it
could impact the existing downtown corridor. One other idea is to develop a
retail tax for the entire city with proceeds going toward downtown revitalization.
On the community integration portion of the findings under Exhibit
B, added emphasis is needed in regards to new residents. New ideas need to
be thought of to bring residents into the community so they feel welcome
and are enocuraged to get involved. There has to be lessons learned from
the Snoqualmie Ridge project. Hey, let’s get them a subscription to the
Valley Record for starters.
Other areas to consider are viewshed buffers, visual affects on
the downtown corridor, wetland preservation and impacts to ancient
Indian habitats.
So keep the discussion to the published record and it will have more
of an impact. Let’s respect the process.
Jim McKiernan
