Opinion

Balance needed in forest management debate

As wildfires rage across millions of acres of western forests and


rangelands, bureaucrats, politicians, environmentalists and foresters are


doing a lot of finger pointing about who's to blame.


For example, foresters say, "I told you so." They point out that if the


U.S. Forest Service had been allowed to manage the forests;harvest


mature trees, implement small controlled burns during


wetter months, remove debri (slash), and replant and


thin young trees, the fire hazard would have been


reduced. They say those restrictions, driven by


environmentalists, have allowed "fuel,"


or forest debris, to accumulate on the forest floor and have left acres of


dead and diseased trees standing, only to burn.


Environmentalists counter that logging practices are to blame,


removing the large, fire-resistant trees and leaving volatile logging debris


and small trees. They favor a


"hands-off" policy that discourages logging,


tree thinning and firefighting in the forests.


Meanwhile, state and federal officials have followed a "let it


burn" policy that endangers public safety. You only have to look to the


1988 Yellowstone National Park inferno as proof.


This debate sounds similar to one that took place 40 years ago. Back


in the 1960s, I spent a lot of time in western Montana's Bitterroot Valley _


eye of the firestorms currently sweeping across the intermountain west.


Parts of the valley were embroiled in a clear-cutting controversy.


Years earlier, in an attempt to eliminate insect infestations and diseases,


including a stubborn and contagious fungus called dwarf mistletoe, the Forest


Service adopted a policy of clear-cutting steep hillsides, terracing them like


the rice plantations in China and replanting them with the more disease


and fire-resistant Ponderosa pine.


Officials argued that selling diseased trees for timber, replenished


the government's forest management budget and footed the bill for roads


that provide firefighters with better access to wildfires. Fresh on their minds,


no doubt, were the 1910 fires that scorched three million acres in


Washington, Idaho and Montana. By the time that firestorm burned itself out


in the wet, winter months, 78 firefighters were dead, entire towns were


burned to the ground and 40,000 square miles of land were left in ashes.


However, in the 1960s, environmentalists objected to the logging


and terracing policy. Many of their objections were valid. Clear-cuts on


dry southwestern slopes had scalped areas that should have been logged


selectively, or not at all.


Since the 1960s, government officials have increasingly adopted


this "hands-off" approach to forest management. Many of the roadless


areas in the Bitterroot National Forest and neighboring national forests in


western Montana and northern Idaho were designated by Congress as


protected wilderness or left undeveloped by Forest Service mandate. In recent years,


supporters of this approach convinced politicians and bureaucrats that


making these areas off-limits to human activity would preserve the


tree-lined valleys and hillsides forever.


But forests are not wall paintings; they are living trees and shrubs


that are born, mature, die and are reborn, often through fire.


The bottom line is that nothing man does will change the laws of


nature. No law or regulation can keep the forests from burning when the


conditions are ripe for wildfire. The best we can hope for is forest


management policies that balance environmental protection and human safety.


The environmentalists' "hands-off" policy is not the only answer.


It may work in remote wilderness areas, but near cities, towns, and small


communities where people live and use the forest, leaving the forest to the


laws of nature won't work.


The deadly 1910 fire was a vivid example of how nature "cleanses"


an unmanaged forest. If a similar fire happened today, it would


endanger hundreds of thousands of lives and destroy billions of dollars worth


of homes, farms and businesses.


The public and politicians need to come to that realization.



Don Brunell is president of the Association of Washington


Business, Washington state's chamber of commerce. Visit AWB on the


Web at www.awb.org.

We encourage an open exchange of ideas on this story's topic, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. Personal attacks, inappropriate language, and off-topic comments may be removed, and comment privileges revoked, per our Terms of Use. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Read the latest Green Edition

Browse the print edition page by page, including stories and ads.

Aug 27 edition online now. Browse the archives.