C'mon Cadman, the writing is on the wall
October 3, 2008 · Updated 1:18 AM
Another blow has been dealt to Cadman's plans for a gravel operation
on Grouse Ridge, but, as in past blows, a common theme is emerging and
the company needs to consider the message.
The Washington State Department of Transportation recently
submitted its comments on the draft environmental impact statement for the
proposed project. Their concerns were very specific, citing first the mixing of
gravel trucks with existing commercial, residential and school traffic. The
concerns are very much geared toward safety. The submitted comments go on to
say that Exit 38 is a much more logical choice and that it is currently underutilized.
Yet, Robin Hansen, Cadman project manager, states that Exit 38 is not
the best option and goes on to point out safety and environmental issues and,
oh yes, an owl problem again.
It used to be that logging was stopped because of concerns for the
Spotted Owl. Now a project is being pushed forward because of these same concerns.
What safety issues could outweigh the school district's in justifying
an exit change for the project? And stating environmental reasons to not look
at Exit 38 coming from a gravel company that has been able to work
around major environmental issues in all other projects seems like a ploy at
naivete rather than a logical argument.
So, let's widen the road to the Fire Training Academy, overcoming the
owl problem. I am sure the state can see its way clear to work with Cadman to
use Exit 38, especially if one of its own agencies is citing it as the best alternative.
A great compromise to an invasive project, albeit with proper zoning and
a generous land contribution, is to use Exit 38.